Producing the MOC package shouldn't take days.
Every change to an in-service asset requires a Management of Change (MOC) package — review, approval, execution, verification, closeout. The package draws on the engineering vault, the maintenance system, and the contractor's deliverables. Producing one for the regulator should take minutes, not days.
Talk to a Process Safety solutions engineer · Read the agentic AI workflow pillar · Read the energy microsite
"Producing an MOC for the regulator takes days."
"My MOC packages live across our engineering vault, our maintenance system, and our contractor's deliverables. Producing one for the regulator takes days." — MOC Engineer / Process Safety Lead
OSHA Process Safety Management 29 CFR 1910.119(l) requires written MOC procedures and records of every change. CCPS Risk Based Process Safety expands the requirement to cover every aspect of the risk-management cycle. The regulator's question — "show me the MOC for [change to valve / pipework / control logic / operating procedure]" — must be answered with a complete package.
When the package is fragmented across systems, the response is slow and the spoliation risk is high. Texas City (BP, 2005) and Buncefield (Hertfordshire Oil Storage, 2005) both traced incident causes back to MOC failures.
What TeamSync gives the MOC Engineer.
1. The MOC package is a structured TeamSync document type.
The MOC document type carries every required field — change description, scope, risk assessment, technical review approver, safety review approver, executor, verifier, closer, post-implementation review. The fields are typed and required; no MOC can be marked complete with missing fields.
2. The agentic AI workflow orchestrates MOC closure.
The Agentic AI Workflow routes the MOC through review and approval steps. Business rules from the Business Rules Engine enforce escalation tiers (e.g., "MOC affecting safety-critical systems requires HSE-Director approval"). Workflow cannot complete without every required signature.
3. The engineering vault, maintenance system, and contractor deliverables converge.
P&IDs from the engineering vault, work orders from Maximo / SAP PM, contractor scopes from the External Portal, vendor calculations — all referenceable from the MOC package. The integration is configured, not custom-coded.
4. The audit ledger anchors every MOC event.
Every initiation, review, approval, execution event, verification, closure recorded in the Merkle audit ledger. Cryptographic verification of the MOC chain via one API call.
5. DocuTalk grounds cross-MOC queries.
"Show me every MOC affecting unit 3 in the last 5 years that involved a vapour-recovery system change" — DocuTalk returns the answer with citations. The lessons-learned conversation becomes a query.
Compliance frameworks satisfied.
| Framework | Coverage |
|---|---|
| OSHA PSM 29 CFR 1910.119(l) | MOC procedures + records |
| CCPS Risk Based Process Safety | Risk-management-cycle evidence |
| API RP 1173 | Pipeline safety MOC management |
| EPA RMP 40 CFR 68 | Risk Management Program MOC requirement |
| EU Seveso III Directive | Major-accident hazard MOC |
| SOC 2, ISO 27001 | Cross-vertical |
How TeamSync compares for MOC.
| Capability | TeamSync | Sphera Process Safety | Enablon EHS | Maximo MOC | OpenText for Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOC workflow with bounded autonomy | ✅ Agentic + Rules | Sphera workflow | Enablon workflow | Maximo workflow | OpenText Process |
| Cryptographic chain-of-custody on MOC events | ✅ Merkle | Standard log | Standard log | Maximo audit | Standard log |
| Cross-system convergence (vault + EAM + contractor) | ✅ | Sphera-side | Enablon-side | Maximo-side | OpenText overlay |
| AI grounded across MOC corpus | ✅ DocuTalk | Limited | Limited | Limited | Aviator |
| Per-cluster transparent pricing | ✅ | Per-product | Per-product | Per-module | Bundled |
CTAs.
| If you are… | Do this |
|---|---|
| MOC Engineer / Process Safety Lead | Talk to a solutions engineer |
| HSE Director designing the MOC governance | Read the CISO/HSE page |
| VP Engineering coordinating MOC + asset integrity | Read the VP Engineering page |
| Internal auditor designing the MOC control test | Read the audit-ledger pillar |
Frequently asked questions.
How does TeamSync MOC interact with our existing PSM management system?
Coexistence pattern. The PSM tool can remain for incident management and PHA workflows; TeamSync owns the MOC document estate and audit anchor. Integration via standard connectors.
Can rules require specific approvers per change risk tier?
Yes. The Business Rules Engine supports per-tier approver requirements (high-risk MOC requires HSE-Director, medium-risk requires Operations Manager, etc.). Rules are owned by Process Safety, not IT; changes propagate without workflow redeployment.
What about cross-asset MOC programmes?
The agentic workflow scales to MOC volumes seen at large operators (thousands per month). Cross-asset MOC reporting is a DocuTalk query.
Related capabilities
- Agentic AI Workflow, Intelligent Repository, Business Rules Engine, DocuTalk, Tamper-evident audit ledger